Last Updated: , 72 days ago.
Can I sue in Ontario to claim disgorgement of improper profits gained from wrongdoing even if I had limited losses?
In Ontario, you may be able to seek disgorgement under the “profiting from wrong” theory when the defendant committed an underlying legal wrong against you and ordinary damages are inadequate, even if your losses were small, because disgorgement is a restitutionary remedy that strips ill gotten gains to discourage wrongful conduct (see Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., 2020 ONSC 6534). Disgorgement is often tied to breaches of fiduciary duty or trust, but courts can grant it exceptionally for other wrongs like certain crimes, breach of contract, or torts when “corresponding deprivation” is shown. If you think someone profited from fraud or misconduct while you were able to mitigate losses, reach out to Lo Greco Law for 30+ year experienced lawyer services and LSO tribunal representation at (416) 488-4110 so we can assess your facts and possible remedies.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
What Can a Victim of Wrongdoing Claim In a Lawsuit If the Victim Was Without the Suffering of a Loss But the Wrongdoer Received a Benefit or Profit From the Wrongdoing?
When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.
Note: For immediate help, please contact Lo Greco Law by phone at: (416) 488-4110 to retain services or to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains
In some circumstances a wrongdoer may receive a benefit or profit arising from the wrongdoing while little, if any, loss or harm arises to the victim of the wrongdoing. Whereas the law generally forbid a person from suing unless a loss or harm has occurred per no harm, no foul principles, a valid lawsuit may involve claims for the illegitimate benefits or profits arising from the misconduct of the wrongdoer.
The Law
The availability of the remedy of disgorgement was well explained within the case of Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, wherein it was said:
[19] Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]
Explained Principles
Imagine a situation where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud upon another person. In some circumstances, the victim may experience little harm or was able to mitigate all or most of the harm that resulted from the fraud and thus little loss, if any occurs; however, the wrongdoer may have significantly benefited or profited from the fraud. The law, applied by the courts, seeking to discourage and deter wrongful conduct, may order that the benefits or profits be disgorged from the wrongdoer and provided to the victim. In this way the remedy of disgorgement ensures that the wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and is, presumably, discouraged and deterred from engaging in wrongful conduct.
Summary Comment
Disgorgement is a restitutionary remedy rather than a compensatory remedy, meaning that the law applies disgorgement as a matter of fairness rather than as a matter of making a victim whole for loss or harm suffered by the victim.
